get on the (band)wagon

one of the most dependable relationship tenets is the fact that when its blatantly obvious that a man is in a committed relationship, there’s a certain segment of women (read: “all“) who will begin to find him more attractive. from latent self-esteem and “distant daddy” issues to the fact that men in relationships generally aren’t pressed to find new pu**y (an attractive quality in the eyes of most women), there are myriad possible reasons for this phenomenon, but, for the most part, it all comes down to one general rule:

women are lemmings (ie: “sheep”, “followers”, “the borg”, “republicans”)

how so, exceedingly omnipotent and virile champ?“, you ask…well

…its all about the wagon. the bandwagon

bandwagon attraction is a general thought process that many women possess, a way of thinking that allows peer-pressure to influence how attractive they might find someone. they practice this everywhere, from the nightclub dynamic where one expertly timed “i think he’s funny looking” can influence an entire flock of chicks into thinking that an relatively unfunny looking guy is, in fact, funny looking, to the entire mystic surrounding the wedding ring:

well…there must be something great about him since someone actually wanted to marry him. i wonder if he wants some head?”

in equation form:

x (a man’s base score)

+

y(1/10)  (the number of women who’ve professed attraction to him with her earshot)

equals

z (his adjusted score)

for instance, if a woman thinks a guy might be a 5 (x), but she hears 20 different women say that he’s attractive (y)*(1/10), his score raises to a 7 (z)

***for a negative remark, the equation stays the same, sans the “1/10th” changing to a “negative 1/10th”***

in no other avenue is this phenomenon more prevalent than when thinking about pop cultural figures. from michael jordan (who, more than any other public figure, made it socially acceptable again to admit attraction to dark-skinned black males) to the mystery surrounding the confusing infatuation black women had with mos def from 2001 to 2004, theres a long and varied history of men becoming “attractive” basically overnight just because a few fickle women deemed them such and their opinions began to pick up steam like, ummm, a thing that picks up lots of steam very quickly.

the patron saint...for now

the patron saint...for now

currently, the 2008 patron saint of bandwagon attraction seems to be hill harper, a man who in less than 30 months has gone from “what kind of f*cking name is hill??” to the de facto ideal mentioned when black women profess an affinity for nerdy n*ggas. in fact, if you google “i need me a hill harper type of n*gga“, over two billion results pop up, with over 500 million of them coming directly from lizburr.com (***editors note: the champ is lying***)

what does this all mean? why are women so easily influenced when it comes to what they find attractive? why did mos def shack up with an nba groupie? who knows. all i know is that i need to start rocking a wedding ring.

on second thought, maybe not. wagons give me motion sickness. i think i’ll pass

–the champ

ms. masochistic

three reasons (limited to three because of time and word constraints. i could very easily extend this list to at least 39 if i desired) why the champ thinks most women are generally masochistic

before we begin, we need a working definition of masochism, just to make sure the mouth breathers reading this have an idea what i’m talking about

—gratification gained from pain, deprivation, degradation, etc., inflicted or imposed on oneself, either as a result of one’s own actions or the actions of others, esp. the tendency to seek this form of gratification.

the act of turning one’s destructive tendencies inward or upon oneself.

—trying to find 8 consecutive bars of intelligible english while listening to the carter 3

carrying on…

1. no pigeons

released in the spring of 1999 by the aggressively forgettable sporty thieves, this song was a response to TLC’s “no scrubs”. it was far and away the most clever of the dozens of recorded retorts to that song, but thats not the reason why i’m highlighting it now. the fact that there were dozens of recorded retorts to this simple song taking about deadbeat dudes is actually my point. you name the song, whether its “bills, bills, bills”, “my neck my back”, “soldier”, “irreplaceable”…whatever. if it’s released by a popular woman and has real or even just perceived negative connotations about men, then you can bet a months pay that within a week of it first hitting the airwaves, there will be response songs, blog posts and thousand word articles written about it.

on the flipside, male artists can basically say whatever the hell they feel about women, and ninety percent of the time, they’re met not just with minimal protest but support!. i never understood this. our (men’s) generally apathetic asses dont ever let stuff like this slide by, but women’s generally annoyingly inquisitive and skeptical behinds continuously let it go like a fart in the wind.

can somebody explain this to me, or at least give me a reason other than stringent masochism why this is allowed to occur? please…take your time, i’m not going anywhere.

no answer still?

moving on…

2. relationship books

go to any relationship book section of any bookstore and you’ll see titles such as “why he’s not into your stupid ass”, “why your man will leave you before you finish this book”, “he’s not gay, he’s just not attracted to you”, “prudish bitch, the story of american women”, “dump him before he dumps you”, “how feminism failed…completely”, and “stop slutting around”…”self-help” books which basically tell women how stupid they are….and women buy them by the bushel!!! it doesnt stop at the purchase either. there will be book buying parties and chapters emailed to every woman they know and carpools to book-signings…a regularly accepted practice of having a shindig celebrating these pugnaciously insulting pieces of literature.

can somebody explain this to me, or at least give me a reason other than stringent masochism why this is allowed to occur? please…take your time, i’m not going anywhere.

no answer still?

moving on…

3. willingly entering doomed relationships

yeah, men do this too….but at least we can blame our penises on our general occasional thimbleheadness. women can’t, not when they generally enter every romantic relationship looking at every angle, getting advice from every close girlfriend, reading horoscopes, googling, calling parole officers, bookmarking every alexyss tylor youtube vid and plotting every bcs and wcs (best and worst case scenario)…and still willingly commit themselves to relationships they know will be more toxic than ann coulter.

can somebody explain this to me, or at least give me a reason other than stringent masochism why this is allowed to occur? please…take your time, i’m not going anywhere.

no answer still?

still waiting. i’ll be here all day though. take your time.

—the champ